1、It is the longest bridge in the country which will be set up in my city next year.
2、He smiled when he knew that he had passed the exam.
3、It was wrote by Herry Jobson？
4、It was a hard work to clean the dropped leaves.
5、Little children usually fall when they begin to go.
做题单选解题方法：
1、直接法
直接利用相关语法知识，通过题干中的已供信息，捕捉到解题线索，从而得出正确答案的解题方法。例：
——Will you come to the net bars(网吧）with me?
——Sorry. My mother always tells me there.
A. not go
B. go
C. not to go
D. to go
【解析】根据句意可知此题考查动词不定式的否定形式，即tell sb. not to do sth.，故此题应选C。
2、关键词法
许多题目中都有这样一些词，它们对于快速而准确地判定答案起着至关重要的作用。我们称这些词为关键词key words。找到句中的关键词，也就找到了解题的突破口，例：
He hardly hurt himself in the accident, ?
A. didn＇t he
B. did he
C. does he
【解析】该题中hardly与hurt是起关键词作用的。凡陈述部分含有hardly，never，little，few等否定意义的词时，反意疑问句用肯定形式；而hurt一词的过去式与原形相同，此处hurt未加s，应为过去式。因此本题答案B是正确的。
3、类推法
如果对题目的备选答案没有十分把握或把握很小，不妨利用＂如果A对，那么B也对＂的类推法，从而可将A、B予以否定，例：
——Who＇s the man at the door？
——．
A. He is a doctor
B. He is a friend of mine
C. He is a famous singer
D. He is twenty
【解析】仔细分析备选答案就可发现：A、C选项针对的是＂职业＂。若A是对的，那么C也会是对的。D回答的是年龄。故惟有B才是正确的。
4、前后照应法
此方法多用于两个以上句子或对话形式命题的题目。解题前透彻理解，然后联系上下文，捕捉隐含信息，方能准确找出答案，例：
——He isn＇t a teacher，is he？
——．He works in a hospital．
A. Yes，he is
B. No，he isn＇t
C. Yes，He isn＇t
D. No，he is
【解析】本题考查否定句的反意疑问句的回答。由后半句的回答，我们知道＂他＂的身份不是教师；对反意疑问句的回答要根据实际情况。因此应选择的是B。
5、排除法
根据题干提供的信息，先把一眼就看出的干扰项排除，缩小选择范围，然后将剩余的选项填入空白处进行检验，辨别真伪，例：
The girl asked the teacher .
A. what does the museum looks like
B. what did the museum look like
C. what the museum looks like
D. what the museum looked like
【解析】本题主要考查宾语从句中的语序及时态的对应关系。主句动词是过去时，从句的谓语动词也应是过去时的某种时态，故A、C被排除。而B中有词序错误，所以D为正确答案。
The Power of Language（这个是原标题，老师为了你们百度就改了标题吧，我是用谷歌找的）原文有点长希望能帮到你。
The words a leader chooses are just as critical as their actions, writes Thomas Moore.
As a writer and psychotherapist, I have been using words carefully
most of my life. While counselling a husband and wife, I notice that a
single word can stir their emotions and take their conversation to a
dark place they both know is negative.
If, for example, I use a word like ‘neurotic’ or even ‘troubled’ in
talking to a client about his situation, he may feel judged and become
defensive. On the other hand, a few honest words of appreciation can put
a marriage back on track.
Words don’t just convey meaning: they are a force.
We live at a time when people are generally pragmatic. We want to be
effective and we don’t care much about the words we use. We see signs of
this carelessness in advertising, where grammar and spelling are
secondary to perkiness and brevity. People drink lite sodas and are
purchasing new tech (technology) for their business offices, and apps
(applications) for their telephones.
Of course language evolves, but you can usually sense the difference
between evolution and neglect. Smoothing out a word like ‘light’ into
‘lite’, we lose its history and associations. The word ultimately goes
back to leukos in Greek and is related to leukaemia, a problem of white
blood cells. We don’t sound the ‘gh’, but its presence there keeps the
memory of the Greek associations.
In my own writing I try to find a midpoint between pedanticism and
love of language. I know what I’m talking about, because I was once
fired from a teaching position at a university in part because I didn’t
write in acceptable academic style. Apparently, my words didn’t have
sufficient or appropriate gravitas.
A Rumi story tells of a dervish walking past a deep well. He hears a voice:
“Help. I’m a writer and I’m stuck down here.”
The dervish says, “I’ll go find out where a ladder’s at.”
“Your grammar’s atrocious,” the writer shouts up.
“Well, then, you’ll have to wait there until my grammar improves,” the dervish says, and walks on.
I feel like the writer in the well waiting for grammar to improve.
And not just grammar. I understand the Sufi complaint about being too
fussy about rules of speech. I’m waiting, too, for a love of language to
return, an appreciation for the words we use and for style and grace in
expression. Like the writer in the well, I could be in for a long wait.
World leaders often use diplomatic language that hides the real
meaning of the words, creating euphemisms that are outright dangerous.
Describing slaughtered and maimed civilians as “collateral damage” is
the classic example for our times, and it’s cynical in the extreme.
“Enhanced interrogation techniques” for ‘torture’ seems part of the
cruelty.
The bland and bloated language of politics blocks the opportunity for
leaders to truly inspire and educate. Imagine hearing instead a
thoughtful, measured analysis of the world situation from a leader,
accompanied by intelligent, subtle solutions to problems. Instead, we
get the tired and unimaginative language of war and militancy. Wars
begin with words, so we should be careful how we speak, especially to
nations where there is tension. Our words can heal the situation before
the military takes up its weapons.
We could all have a rule that we won’t use words that come to us
unconsciously and out of habit or that are in the common parlance of
public discourse. Fresh words could help us arrive at fresh ideas, for
there is an intimate connection between thought and word. Careful use of
words requires careful thinking.
Sometimes I wonder if the language of progressive movements gets in
the way of the message. I, for one, always stumble at the word
‘sustainability’. When I think about it, I know what it means, but it
doesn’t feel like a friendly word. I’d rather talk about not being
wasteful, or about using resources carefully and wisely.
‘Environmentalism’ isn’t such a friendly word either. Maybe we need a
new, simple word or phrase – ‘care for the world’.
World peace begins with peace in the family. As a therapist, I’ve
heard many adults recite hurtful words they heard decades ago from a
parent or sibling. Care in speaking to children requires a degree of
self-possession, the ability to see past the blind emotion of the moment
to the needs of the child. Good words come from that greater vision.
For example, words of extreme praise can do wonders for the injured
ego of a child or spouse. Sometimes it’s helpful to give words to what
is usually left unspoken. “I appreciate what you did for me. I’m happy
that you’re with me.” Simple, direct and felt words of praise,
appreciation and gratitude often go unsaid, when they could be a handy
means of healing. Words hurt and words heal.
Every day offers opportunities to say words of encouragement and
recognition. No matter how strong or successful we are, we all need such
words. But often they may seem unnecessary. My rule is: if the thought
occurs to me to say something supportive, I say it. You can never speak
too often in praise and appreciation. You can also receive that praise,
when it comes, gracefully – with words. “Thank you for saying that. I
need to hear that.”
A friend of our family, an intelligent, progressive Catholic priest,
always praises our children to the skies. He is extravagant in his
language, and everyone knows he overdoes it with his praise. But we all
love to see him, and we treasure his friendship. We don’t need realism
and moderation from such a friend.
Everywhere today marriage partners and children are in distress. I
have no doubt that one simple solution would be to offer them words of
support. When used with care, language can be therapeutic. Even, and
maybe especially, when a person is being difficult and belligerent,
words of understanding and affirmation, realistic and felt, can often
help.本回答被网友采纳