求英文高手翻译 托福阅读

Cities develop as a result of functions that they can perform, some functions result directly from the ingenuity of the citizenry, but most functions result from the needs of the local area and of the surrounding hinterland (the region that supplies goods to the city and to which the city furnishes services and other goods). Geographers often make a distinction between the situation and the site of a city. Situation refers to the general position in relation to the surrounding region, whereas site involves physical characteristics of the specific location. Situation is normally much more important to the continuing prosperity of a city. If a city is well situated in regard to its hinterland, its development is much more likely to continue. Chicago, for example, possesses an almost unparalleled situation: it is located at the southern end of a huge lake that forces east-west transportation lines to be compressed into its vicinity, and at a meeting of significant land and water transport routes. It also overlooks what is one of the world's finest large farming regions. These factors ensured that Chicago would become a great city regardless of the disadvantageous characteristics of the available site, such as being prone to flooding during thunderstorm activity.
Similarly, it can be argued that much of New York City's importance stems from its early and continuing advantage of situation. Philadelphia and Boston both originated at about the same time as New York and shared New York's location at the western end of one of the world's most important oceanic trade mutes, but only New York possesses an easy-access functional connection (the Hudson-Mohawk lowland) to the vast Midwestern hinterland. This account does not alone explain New York's primacy, but it does include several important factors. Among the many aspects of Situation that help to explain why some cities grow and others do not, original location on a navigable waterway seems particularly applicable. Of course, such characteristic as slope, drainage, power resources, river crossings, coastal shapes, and other physical characteristics help to determine city location, but such factors am normally more significant in early stages of city development than later.

为了说明雷暴活动。
同样的,可以说,纽约市的重要性源于其早期和持续的利用情况。
费城和波士顿都起源于纽约的同时,分享d西端的纽约的位置之一,世界上最重要的海洋贸易通路,但只有纽约拥有快捷功能连接(Hudson-Mohawk低地)广阔的中西部内陆地区。
这个账户不单独解释纽约的主导地位,但它包括几个重要的因素。
在许多方面的情况,有助于解释为什么一些城市和其他不增长,原始位置在通航水道似乎特别适用。
当然,斜坡等特点、排水、电力资源、河口岸,沿海形状,和其他物理特性有助于确定城市位置,但这些因素通常是更重要的在城市发展的早期阶段。
为了说明雷暴活动。
同样的,可以说,纽约市的重要性源于其早期和持续的利用情况。
费城和波士顿都起源于纽约的同时,分享d西端的纽约的位置之一,世界上最重要的海洋贸易通路,但只有纽约拥有快捷功能连接(Hudson-Mohawk低地)广阔的中西部内陆地区。
这个账户不单独解释纽约的主导地位,但它包括几个重要的因素。
在许多方面的情况,有助于解释为什么一些城市和其他不增长,原始位置在通航水道似乎特别适用。
当然,斜坡等特点、排水、电力资源、河口岸,沿海形状,和其他物理特性有助于确定城市位置,但这些因素通常是更重要的在城市发展的早期阶段。~我回答的对么
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2014-11-08
度娘在线意见翻译,,,其实有些翻译有点奇怪但爱莫能助凑合着用吧哈哈哈哈哈

城市发展的结果,他们可以执行的功能,有些功能结果直接从公民的聪明才智,但大部分功能,导致当地的需要和周围腹地(该地区供应货物给城市和城市所提供服务和其他商品)。地理学家往往使一个城市的现场情况之间的区别。情境是关系到周围地区的一般位置,场所则涉及具体位置的物理特性。情况通常是更重要的对城市的持续发展。如果一个城市也坐落在其腹地,其发展更可能继续。芝加哥,例如,具有无与伦比的情况:它位于一个巨大的湖泊,军队的东西交通线被压缩成其附近的南部,在重要的土地和水的运输路线的会议。它还忽视了一个世界上最好的大农业区是什么。这些因素使芝加哥成为不可用的网站不利的特点是一个伟大的城市,如雷暴活动易受洪水。
同样的,可以说,纽约大城的重要性源于其情况的早期和持续的优势。费城和波士顿都起源于同一时间像纽约和共享纽约的位置在一个世界上最重要的海洋贸易要道西端,但只有纽约拥有一个易于访问的功能连接(Hudson莫霍克低地)对广大的中西部腹地。该帐户不能单独解释纽约的主导地位,但它包括几个重要的因素。多方面的情况,有助于解释为什么一些城市发展和其他人不在,对航道的原始位置似乎特别适用。当然,这样的特征,坡度,排水,电力资源,河流,沿海的形状,和其他物理特性有助于确定城市定位,但这样的因素是通常更重要的在城市发展的早期阶段比晚。本回答被提问者和网友采纳
相似回答