第1个回答 2007-04-17
绝对的!手写!楼主相信!
A section of commercial course human resources article, the urgentneed translates English. Therefore, the goal hypothesis should propose by staff, with themanager checked together these goals, let the manager turn theassistance subordinate to achieve the oneself goal the role but thenon- product tube. In the special case and team operation frequenttoday, the work final achievement increasingly difficultly controlsday by day by the staff individual plenary powers palm, the dutyinstruction booklet only can treat as is the reference, but non-ossified execution handbook. Achieves the organization goal howregarding the affiliation by staff's work achievements, in the processshould retain some degree the independency and the creativity space,establishes own by the staff goal, lets them the demand which obtainsin the work oneself wants, the manager be supposed to do only isassists the staff buckles individual goal and the organization goallink in the same place, but non- force -like choice. Follows suchprinciple, not only may enhance internal motive which the staff works,also avoids the manager to assist the staff establishes when the goalto make excuses does a job carelessly as well as the release hostilityburden, simultaneously satisfies staff individual and organization'sgoal. Certainly, voluntarily establishes the goal by the staff also to havea major problem, some trade unions choose contribution lower the goalwhich but is easy to complete or sedulously pull down the goalstandard well to let own goal be easier to achieve, this is a saferstrategy after all. This time, should the manager do is listensattentively, why lets the litigant oneself indicate the goal theexpected value with because of the difficulty, achieves in theprocedure the fair cognition, again provides the concrete evidence orthe instance, carries on the associates or the surveying rod compares,again reestablishes the goal immediately by the litigant. If the mutual recognition with difficulty forms as before, the bodyhas the authority for the manager to decide the final expectation goaland the goal standard. After all, the organization employs a person tocome when "manager" the important responsibility is guarantees thesubordinate the achievements to conform to the organization goal, isnot when good guy or the worry subordinate does like oneself. Theorganization regards manager's achievements, is its leadership unit orthe team "specifically delivers", but must "human spirit index".本回答被网友采纳
第2个回答 2007-04-16
我是手工翻译的啊!晕!
A section of commercial course human resources article, the urgentneed translates English. Therefore, the goal hypothesis should propose by staff, with themanager checked together these goals, let the manager turn theassistance subordinate to achieve the oneself goal the role but thenon- product tube. In the special case and team operation frequenttoday, the work final achievement increasingly difficultly controlsday by day by the staff individual plenary powers palm, the dutyinstruction booklet only can treat as is the reference, but non-ossified execution handbook. Achieves the organization goal howregarding the affiliation by staff's work achievements, in the processshould retain some degree the independency and the creativity space,establishes own by the staff goal, lets them the demand which obtainsin the work oneself wants, the manager be supposed to do only isassists the staff buckles individual goal and the organization goallink in the same place, but non- force -like choice. Follows suchprinciple, not only may enhance internal motive which the staff works,also avoids the manager to assist the staff establishes when the goalto make excuses does a job carelessly as well as the release hostilityburden, simultaneously satisfies staff individual and organization'sgoal. Certainly, voluntarily establishes the goal by the staff also to havea major problem, some trade unions choose contribution lower the goalwhich but is easy to complete or sedulously pull down the goalstandard well to let own goal be easier to achieve, this is a saferstrategy after all. This time, should the manager do is listensattentively, why lets the litigant oneself indicate the goal theexpected value with because of the difficulty, achieves in theprocedure the fair cognition, again provides the concrete evidence orthe instance, carries on the associates or the surveying rod compares,again reestablishes the goal immediately by the litigant. If the mutual recognition with difficulty forms as before, the bodyhas the authority for the manager to decide the final expectation goaland the goal standard. After all, the organization employs a person tocome when "manager" the important responsibility is guarantees thesubordinate the achievements to conform to the organization goal, isnot when good guy or the worry subordinate does like oneself. Theorganization regards manager's achievements, is its leadership unit orthe team "specifically delivers", but must "human spirit index".
第3个回答 2007-04-16
因此Therefore, the goal hypothesis should propose by staff, with themanager checked together these goals, let the manager turn theassistance subordinate to achieve the oneself goal the role but thenon- product tube. In the special case and team operation frequenttoday, the work final achievement increasingly difficultly controlsday by day by the staff individual plenary powers palm, the dutyinstruction booklet only can treat as is the reference, but non-ossified execution handbook. Achieves the organization goal howregarding the affiliation by staff's work achievements, in the processshould retain some degree the independency and the creativity space,establishes own by the staff goal, lets them the demand which obtainsin the work oneself wants, the manager be supposed to do only isassists the staff buckles individual goal and the organization goallink in the same place, but non- force -like choice. Follows suchprinciple, not only may enhance internal motive which the staff works,also avoids the manager to assist the staff establishes when the goalto make excuses does a job carelessly as well as the release hostilityburden, simultaneously satisfies staff individual and organization'sgoal. Certainly, voluntarily establishes the goal by the staff also to havea major problem, some trade unions choose contribution lower the goalwhich but is easy to complete or sedulously pull down the goalstandard well to let own goal be easier to achieve, this is a saferstrategy after all. This time, should the manager do is listensattentively, why lets the litigant oneself indicate the goal theexpected value with because of the difficulty, achieves in theprocedure the fair cognition, again provides the concrete evidence orthe instance, carries on the associates or the surveying rod compares,again reestablishes the goal immediately by the litigant. If the mutual recognition with difficulty forms as before, the bodyhas the authority for the manager to decide the final expectation goaland the goal standard. After all, the organization employs a person tocome when "manager" the important responsibility is guarantees thesubordinate the achievements to conform to the organization goal, isnot when good guy or the worry subordinate does like oneself. Theorganization regards manager's achievements, is its leadership unit orthe team "specifically delivers", but must "human spirit index".