As a necessary tool in daily life, vehicles, cars and airplanes in particular, have empowered people to go wherever they want, yet are frequently blamed for environmental problems. But it appears to me that in an attempt to address these problems, the simple rise of fuel prices is feasible but not the most effective and efficient solution.
ä½ä¸ºæ¥å¸¸çæ´»ä¸å¿
ä¸å¯å°çå·¥å
·ï¼ç¹å«æ¯æ±½è½¦ã汽车åé£æºï¼è®©äººä»¬å¯ä»¥å»ä»»ä½ä»ä»¬æ³å»çå°æ¹ï¼å´å¸¸å¸¸è¢«æ责为ç¯å¢é®é¢ç罪é祸é¦ãä½å¨æçæ¥ï¼ä¸ºäºè§£å³è¿äºé®é¢ï¼çæä»·æ ¼çç®åä¸æ¶¨æ¯å¯è¡çï¼ä½ä¸æ¯æææåæææç解å³æ¹æ¡ã
Higher fuel cost in theory will reduce air pollution and relieve the fuel shortage. This is mainly because the higher the price of fuel is, the fewer drivers will afford it and cars and other vehicles will be used even less. The emission of greenhouse gases, the main contributor of global warming, will therefore decline and fewer fuels are consumed. However, this is not that simple in real life.Unable to drive cars as usual or to choose other transportation, workers will hardly work efficiently as most of them in todayâs world rely heavily on cars and different vehicles especially for long distance commuters. In this case, they would rather pay the higher price than earn less or even lose their job.
ç论ä¸ï¼çæææ¬ä¸åå°åå°ç©ºæ°æ±¡æï¼ç¼è§£çæç缺ãè¿ä¸»è¦æ¯å 为çæä»·æ ¼è¶é«ï¼å°±ä¼ææ´å°çå¸æºè´æ
å¾èµ·ï¼è汽车åå
¶ä»è½¦è¾ç使ç¨å°ä¼æ´å°ã温室æ°ä½çææ¾ï¼æ¯å
¨çåæç主è¦åå ï¼å°å æ¤åå°ï¼åå°çææ¶èãç¶èï¼å¨ç°å®çæ´»ä¸ï¼è¿å¹¶ä¸æ¯é£ä¹ç®åãç±äºæ æ³åå¾å¸¸ä¸æ ·å¼è½¦æéæ©å
¶ä»äº¤éå·¥å
·ï¼å·¥äººä»¬å¾é¾ææå°å·¥ä½ï¼å 为å¨å½ä»ä¸çï¼å¤§å¤æ°äººé½ä¸¥éä¾èµæ±½è½¦åä¸åç车è¾ï¼å°¤å
¶æ¯é¿ééå¤è
ãå¨è¿ç§æ
åµä¸ï¼ä»ä»¬å®æ¿ä»åºæ´é«ç代价ï¼ä¹ä¸æ¿èµå¾æ´å°ï¼çè³ä¸¢æå·¥ä½ã
Increasing the cost of fuel could not resolve all environmental problems. During the delivery of oil to different places around the world, oil more often than not leaks into the oceans and contaminates the water, a severe environmental problem that seems to be unsolvable now. Whatâs worse, marine animals will die mainly because their habitat, the ocean, has been polluted and become inhabitable.
å¢å çæçææ¬å¹¶ä¸è½è§£å³ææçç¯å¢é®é¢ãå¨åä¸çåå°è¾éç³æ²¹çè¿ç¨ä¸ï¼ç³æ²¹å¾å¾ä¼æ³æ¼å°æµ·æ´ä¸ï¼æ±¡ææ°´æºï¼è¿æ¯ä¸ä¸ªä¸¥éçç¯å¢é®é¢ï¼ç°å¨çæ¥æ¯æ æ³è§£å³çãæ´ç³ç³çæ¯ï¼æµ·æ´å¨ç©å°ä¼æ»äº¡ï¼ä¸»è¦æ¯å 为å®ä»¬çæ æ¯å°ï¼æµ·æ´ï¼å·²ç»è¢«æ±¡æï¼å¹¶åå¾éå®å±
ä½ã
This suggestion is less workable than other measures,like taking advantage of some cutting-edge technology and science to actively seek alternative fuel. For example, mainly powered by clean fuels or electricity,some fuel-efficient vehicles and electric cars, both of which have been widely used in most places of the world, not just burn less fuel but generate few emission.
è¿ä¸å»ºè®®æ¯å
¶ä»æªæ½æ´ä¸å¯è¡ï¼æ¯å¦å©ç¨ä¸äºå°ç«¯ææ¯åç§å¦ï¼ç§¯æ寻æ¾æ¿ä»£çæãä¾å¦ï¼ä¸»è¦ç±æ¸
æ´çææçµå驱å¨ï¼ä¸äºçæ²¹ç汽车åçµå¨æ±½è½¦ï¼è¿ä¸¤ç§çæå¨ä¸çä¸ç大å¤æ°å°æ¹é½è¢«å¹¿æ³ä½¿ç¨ï¼ä¸ä»
çç§è¾å°ççæï¼èä¸äº§çå¾å°çææ¾ã
In conclusion, viable as it is , increasing the cost of fuels is not ideal and to a larger extent fails to be realistic and other ways need to be introduced.
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考